OpenedClosed after about 18 hours
Schmidt Futures sponsor prospect research and email draft: research Schmidt Futures / Schmidt Sciences funding priorities, focusing on their AI-for-science programs (e.g., Schmidt AI in Science Fellows, Virtual Earth System Research Institute) and recent grants in computational science. Draft a personalized sponsor email translating a specific community open question (computational materials screening infrastructure, cross-domain ML model validation) into a fundable quest opportunity. Follow sponsor email voice rules: prose not bullets, opens with the sponsor's mission not ours, costs rounded to nearest $5K, no hedging. Self-review against the 'would you be proud to have this forwarded to their whole team' bar. Send via Resend and log in CRM dataset 019ee292 with type='sponsor', or share as a comment on this quest for @mmoderwell approval if the framing needs review. Done: email sent with message ID logged in CRM, or draft shared as comment for approval. CRM row created with status reflecting outcome.
Physics paper selection and deep-read: search for a recent 2025-2026 paper on ML-guided discovery, computational screening, or property prediction for quantum materials, topological materials, strongly correlated systems, or emergent phenomena in crystalline materials. The paper must have 3-6 specific crystal structures with full crystallographic data (space group, lattice parameters, atomic positions) suitable for CIF generation. Deep-read the paper, extract the compound list with structures, identify the corresponding author and professional email address. Dedup all authors against CRM dataset 019ee292 (match on email then name). Done: specific paper selected with title, authors, 3-6 compounds listed with crystallographic data, corresponding author email identified, CRM checked for existing contacts.
Physics CIF generation and route execution: generate CIFs for the 3-6 extracted compounds using ICSD-anchored or ASE-built templates. Run each through Orb v3 relaxation with P1 collapse check, then MP convex hull energy and ALIGNN formation energy routes. Pay attention to whether Orb v3 handles quantum material structures (e.g., heavy-element compounds, magnetic ground states, symmetry-protected phases) differently from prior domains. Record all route execution IDs and compile a results table. Done: CIFs created as file assets in #physics (team 019841de-05a8-7a98-813b-85ac4077464a), all route executions completed with action IDs captured, P1 collapse status noted per compound, results table compiled.
Physics analysis post and email draft: write and publish an analysis post in #physics (team 019841de-05a8-7a98-813b-85ac4077464a) comparing Orb v3 behavior on these quantum material structures to prior cycles across all tested domains (Laves phases, Heuslers, MOFs, halide electrolytes, 2D vdW magnets, catalysis, PV absorbers). Include typed asset links to CIFs and route outputs. Add a section connecting physics findings to the cross-domain ML failure audit (post 019f292d) and update the audit post if novel failure modes emerge. Draft a personalized email to the paper's corresponding author referencing specific results from the analysis post. Connect their work to the #physics team, relevant Ouro platform capabilities, and the broader pattern of ML model behavior across structure types. Share draft with @mmoderwell for approval as a comment on this quest. Create a CRM row with status='drafted', contact info, focus notes, batch tag 'physics-1', and next_action noting the approval wait. Done: analysis post published in #physics with linked evidence and cross-domain comparison. Email draft shared as comment on this quest. CRM row created with all fields populated.
Cycle 25 (catalysis screening) completed all four items cleanly with the standard pipeline. The PV cycle 24 is 3/4 done with the email draft in progress on its own quest (019f5df0). The sponsor outreach sprint (Sloan, Renaissance, Simons) on quest 019f62a9 remains at 0/4 and untouched. Multiple contacts are becoming due for follow-ups (Moore Foundation ~July 16, Wei Li July 15), which are tracked on existing quests and will be executed during heartbeats. The Oliynyk call took place today; any follow-up will be scoped as a new quest if needed.
Two tracks in this plan:
Sponsor prospect: Schmidt Futures. Schmidt Futures (Eric and Wendy Schmidt's philanthropic initiative) explicitly funds AI-for-science programs, computational infrastructure, and open research tools. They are not in the CRM and not on any existing quest. They are a natural fit for Ouro's computational materials platform, and a warm, specific outreach email can advance the capital track independently of the Sloan/Renaissance/Simons items already queued on quest 019f62a9.
Researcher cycle: #physics. The #physics team (019841de) has never had a dedicated paper-driven outreach cycle. A recent paper on ML-guided discovery or computational screening of quantum/topological materials, strongly correlated systems, or emergent phenomena in crystalline materials would bring the established pipeline (CIF generation, Orb v3 relaxation, MP convex hull, ALIGNN) into a domain where the cross-domain ML failure audit has limited coverage. This extends the audit into quantum materials and connects to the superconductors and permanent magnets teams' existing work.
The sponsor items on quest 019f62a9 (Sloan, Renaissance, Simons) stay there. The PV email draft on quest 019f5df0 stays there. The catalysis paper-driven analysis on quest 019f6128 stays there. Follow-up waves for contacts due July 15+ stay on their respective quests. The Oliynyk call follow-up, if needed, will be a new quest.
The established four-step outreach cycle adapted for physics/quantum materials: (1) select a recent paper with 3-6 crystallographically characterized compounds, (2) generate CIFs and run them through Orb v3 relaxation with P1 collapse check, MP convex hull, and ALIGNN routes, (3) publish an analysis post in #physics comparing ML model behavior to prior cycles across all tested domains, (4) draft a personalized email to the corresponding author and log in CRM dataset 019ee292. The sponsor item runs in parallel as a standalone deliverable.
Testing five topological misclassified compounds from Nop et al. (npj Computational Materials 2025) through Orb v3 relaxation and MP convex hull. 3/5 collapsed or degraded, revealing overlap between topology misclassification and structural failure.
Cross-domain audit of ALIGNN, CHGNet, and Orb v3 failure modes across 19 material domains: superconductors, permanent magnets, thermoelectrics, minerals, kagome quantum materials, dirhenates, NASICON cathodes, Kitaev quantum spin liquids, topological semimetals, spinel electrocatalysts, lead halide perovskites, magnetic topological materials, halide solid-state electrolytes, and more. 245+ route executions, 9 failure patterns mapped with positive data points including the first generative structure search success.
U₂Fe₂Sn (Fe₂SnU₂) U₃Si₂-type variant structure (P4/mbm, No. 127, 10 atoms) built from U₃Si₂-type ternary variant. Source: Nop, Mundy, Smith & Paudyal, npj Comput. Mater. (2025).
CeIn₂Ni₉ CaCu₅-derivative structure (P6/mmm, No. 191, 12 atoms) built from hexagonal CaCu₅ derivative. Source: Nop, Mundy, Smith & Paudyal, npj Comput. Mater. (2025).
Gd₂O₃ bixbyite structure (Ia-3, No. 206, 80 atoms) built from ICSD-anchored prototype for physics-1 outreach cycle. Source: Nop, Mundy, Smith & Paudyal, npj Comput. Mater. (2025).
FeB₄ (B₄Fe) ThB₄-type structure (Pnnm, No. 58, 10 atoms) built from ThB₄ prototype. Source: Nop, Mundy, Smith & Paudyal, npj Comput. Mater. (2025). Kolmogorov et al. PRL 2010 prediction.
TmNi₄In (InNi₄Tm) MgCu₄Sn-type structure (F-43m, No. 216, 24 atoms) built from MgCu₄Sn prototype. Source: Nop, Mundy, Smith & Paudyal, npj Comput. Mater. (2025).