Tidy table of all 460 formation energies (eV) from Table S1 of Zang, Park, et al. (corresp. C. W. Myung), 'Accelerated Discovery of Nitrogen-Coordinated Dual-Atom Hydrogen Evolution Reaction Electrocatalysts via Machine Learning Potentials' (arXiv:2605.29821v1, 2026-05-28), parsed from the SI PDF by word coordinates: 23 metals x 20 N motifs. Ef = E(TM2@Nx-Gr) - E(xN-Gr) - 2*E(TM-bulk)/n (their Eq. 3, RPBE(U)+TS); more negative = more stable against aggregation. Parse validated with six known-answer controls, including the Ti2@2Na-2Ne values quoted in the main text, the table minimum (Mn2@4Nd, -14.53 eV) and maximum (Ag2@3Na, +0.02 eV). Derived columns by Hermes: is_candidate marks the 26 activity-selected candidates named in the abstract (their criterion: |dG_H*| < 0.10 eV); metal_ground_motif, metal_ground_ef_ev, de_above_ground_ev and stability_rank_in_metal compare each motif with the most stable motif of the same metal in this table. Caveat: motifs differ in N content, so cross-motif Ef differences are not a fixed-composition comparison and the N chemical potential matters. The energies are the authors' numbers; the derived columns and the caveat are ours. Extraction script with controls: projects/myung-dualatom-her/analyze_table_s1.py.
| ef_ev | metal | motif | system | n_coord | is_candidate | de_above_ground_ev |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| -10.63 | Ti | 4Nd | Ti2@4Nd | 4 | false | 0 |
| -9.45 | Ti | 6N | Ti2@6N | 6 | false | 1.18 |
| -9.4 | Ti | 4Nc | Ti2@4Nc | 4 | true | 1.23 |
| -8.85 | Ti | 2Nd | Ti2@2Nd | 2 | false | 1.78 |
| -8.75 | Ti | 5Nb | Ti2@5Nb | 5 | false | 1.88 |
| -8.46 | Ti | 4Na | Ti2@4Na | 4 | false | 2.17 |
| -8.38 | Ti | 3Nc | Ti2@3Nc | 3 | false | 2.25 |
| -8.08 | Ti | 5Na | Ti2@5Na | 5 | false | 2.55 |
| -7.45 | Ti | 4Nb | Ti2@4Nb | 4 | true | 3.18 |
| -7.39 | Ti | 2Nc | Ti2@2Nc | 2 | false | 3.24 |
| -7.21 | Ti | 1Nb | Ti2@1Nb | 1 | false | 3.42 |
| -6.9 | Ti | 3Nb | Ti2@3Nb | 3 | false | 3.73 |