Ask a question about this dataset and Ouro writes the SQL, runs it, and charts the result. Save the ones worth keeping as views.
Measured Curie temperatures for seven magnet anchors compared against two cheap prediction methods. rf_loo_pred_k is the BYU group's released random-forest model (github.com/msg-byu/ML-for-CurieTemp-Predictions, commit 80841ce4) with every row of the anchor's composition removed before training, so no value is scored from a model that saw the compound's own measured Tc. rows_in_hart_data / hart_data_tc_values report what the released DS1+DS2 data holds for that composition (their data encodes non-ferromagnetic elements as Tc = 0). tb2j_mc_tc_k is our own TB2J plus Monte Carlo prediction from the RE-Free Permanent Magnet Leaderboard work. Method controls (2026-09-24): their 67/33 recipe reproduces at MAE 74.5 K (R2 0.849); train-DS1 test-DS2 gives 90.5 K; leave-one-out on 100 random compositions of their own data gives MAE 61.7 K with bias -23.8 K.